What We Do
Our Story
Core Values
Meet the Team
Our Approach
The Federal Reserve’s latest Supervision and Regulation Report paints a broadly healthy picture of the U.S. banking system, with more than 99% of banks well-capitalized, record deposits of $19.5 trillion, and large banks reporting a 14% return on equity in the first quarter of 2026. At the same time, regulators are sharpening their focus on areas of potential stress, specifically private credit exposures, partnerships with non-bank financial institutions, and concentrated commercial real estate holdings in the office and multifamily sectors, where delinquency rates remain above historical averages. The Fed is pushing institutions to strengthen collateral frameworks and stress test their CRE portfolios against the possibility that higher interest rates persist longer than expected.
Our Take
For private market investors, the Fed’s report delivers a split verdict worth understanding carefully. The banking system’s underlying strength is genuine and meaningful, but the areas regulators are now watching most closely sit right at the intersection of commercial real estate and private credit, two asset classes that define much of the private market landscape today.
From an underwriting perspective, the Fed’s concern about concentrated CRE portfolios in office and multifamily is not a surprise. Delinquency rates in both sectors have stayed above historical norms as higher borrowing costs have pressured owners who relied on cheap debt or aggressive rent growth assumptions. The regulator’s push for more rigorous stress testing under a prolonged higher-rate environment is simply asking banks to do what disciplined private market managers should already be doing: underwriting to real conditions, not optimistic ones.
For private market investors, the spotlight on private credit is equally worth watching. Regulators are urging banks to audit their collateral frameworks for non-bank counterparties, which signals that the connections between bank lending and private credit platforms are drawing closer scrutiny. This does not mean private credit is in trouble. It means the asset class has grown large enough to matter to systemic regulators, which is a sign of maturity, not fragility.
In practical terms, the report reinforces a principle that patient capital has always favored: selectivity at the asset and sponsor level is what separates durable returns from cyclical disappointment. When regulators single out concentrated or undisciplined exposure as the risk to watch, they are, in effect, making the case for conservative leverage and careful collateral analysis. The key takeaway is that a sound banking system creates a stable foundation, but within that system, the quality of individual underwriting decisions still determines outcomes.
If you’re curious about how our approach could fit into your portfolio, schedule a call to connect with our team. We’d love to talk through what we’re seeing and where we’re going next.
